NeurIPS Paper Reviews Released, Controversies Resurface
The NeurIPS 2020 paper reviews were sent out last Friday, starting the author response phase.
Tag: Paper Review
Poorly-Explained NeurIPS 2020 Desk-Rejects Peeve ML Researchers
NeurIPS desk-rejects (papers passed over without review) has become “a super noisy process,” complains a post in the Reddit Machine Learning group.
IEEE Reverses Huawei Paper Review Restrictions
In a new statement issued late Sunday, the world’s largest technical professional organization the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) announced it is lifting restrictions it had imposed scarcely a week ago on editorial and peer reviews involving employees of Chinese tech communication giant Huawei.
ML Community Raises Inclusivity Concerns After IEEE Bars Huawei Paper Reviewers
The world’s biggest technical professional organization, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) issued a statement on May 22 that forbids its colleagues from Huawei and 68 of its affiliates from reviewing or accessing non-public papers submitted by other persons for publications.
Researchers Question KDD 2019 Paper Review Process
The 25th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) released its paper acceptance results this week, and many researchers whose papers were rejected have taken to social media to question the review process.
NIPS 2018 Paper Reviews In; Researchers Unimpressed
Researchers who submitted papers to the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2018 (NIPS) began receiving their reviews last week — and many are less than satisfied.
AI Community Reacts to Reddit Post: Are Grad Students Reviewing NIPS Papers?
NIPS’ peer reviewer selection process came under question in the AI community last week, when a Reddit user who identified as a predoctoral student posted that they had been selected as a NIPS reviewer, and needed advice on how to properly write paper reviews…